<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tilly&#039;s Zoids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pointytilly.net/zoids/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pointytilly.net/zoids</link>
	<description>Zoids: Multiplying by dividing since 1983</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Valga by rcm</title>
		<link>http://www.pointytilly.net/zoids/?p=612#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>rcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointytilly.net/zoids/?p=612#comment-176</guid>
		<description>I think this is the only english-language review that goes into how tricky this thing is to build. I just had to look at the correction sheet, assume, and then hope for the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the only english-language review that goes into how tricky this thing is to build. I just had to look at the correction sheet, assume, and then hope for the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cosmozoid by crimso</title>
		<link>http://www.pointytilly.net/zoids/?p=151#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>crimso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 21:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointytilly.net/zoids/?p=151#comment-56</guid>
		<description>At least, a good review of that good ol&#039; Cosmozoid ! It seems to me that he&#039;s one of the most overlooked of the first wind-up. It&#039;s hard to find infos on him on the web. I&#039;ve got one in a rather good condition. It may sounds strange, but I prefer the 83/85 generation of Zoids to the newer one (even if obviously, there&#039;s a lot of cool one in the more recent, but...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least, a good review of that good ol' Cosmozoid ! It seems to me that he's one of the most overlooked of the first wind-up. It's hard to find infos on him on the web. I've got one in a rather good condition. It may sounds strange, but I prefer the 83/85 generation of Zoids to the newer one (even if obviously, there's a lot of cool one in the more recent, but...)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

